Jgarber RedCloth

Comments and changes to this ticket

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  emime March 4th, 2009 @ 02:57 AM

  Hello, I'm sorry...but really the code does not work...

  Actually, with the code above, the to_latex method uses always section (without underscore).

  I tried also this: @@@ doctt = RedCloth.new(mytextile) doctt.latex_numbering = false latex = doctt.to_latex.to_s@@@

  I guess something is wrong ...don't know wath...please help.

  Emi

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  emime March 4th, 2009 @ 05:29 AM

  Hello, be patient, I told I'm newbie...

  Here a possible solution (that works!!)...I need to check the latex_numbering attribute during the headers definition as follows:
  

  
  # headers
    { :h1 => 'section*',
      :h2 => 'subsection*',
      :h3 => 'subsubsection*',
      :h4 => 'textbf',
      :h5 => 'textbf',
      :h6 => 'textbf',
    }.each do |m,tag| 
      define_method(m) do |opts|
      #check numbering option
      if latex_numbering then tag=tag.delete('*') end
      "\\#{tag}{#{opts[:text]}}\n\n" 
      end 
    end 
  

  Now the following will work correctly:

  
  latex = RedCloth.new(textile)
  latex.latex_numbering = false
  latex = latex.to_latex.to_s
  

  I don't know if it's the right way...but works

• 

  Bil Kleb March 6th, 2009 @ 05:49 AM

  I would vote to avoid using the starred versions altogether and let the surrounding LaTeX environment control section numbering via LaTeX's secnumdepth counter, e.g., \setcounter{secnumdepth}{-1} will turn off all section numbering whereas \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} (LaTeX's default) will only number down to level 2 headings (subsections).

• 

  Bil Kleb March 6th, 2009 @ 05:50 AM

  • Title changed from “Equation numbering option in to_latex” to “Section numbering option in to_latex”

  To align title with contents, renamed "Equation numbering" to "Section numbering".

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  emime March 6th, 2009 @ 07:00 AM

  I would vote to avoid using the starred versions altogether

  You are true. \setcounter can be placed in the preamble file and this way numbering is left to a document 'design' decision.

  I complain also about h4, h5 and so....why use \textbf?

  Finally, we can use the following:

  
  # headers
    { :h1 => 'section',
      :h2 => 'subsection',
      :h3 => 'subsubsection',
      :h4 => 'paragraph',
      :h5 => 'subparapgraph',
      :h6 => 'textbf',
    }.each do |m,tag| 
      define_method(m) do |opts|
      "\\#{tag}{#{opts[:text]}}\n\n" 
      end 
    end 
  

  To align title with contents ops...

• 

  Bil Kleb March 6th, 2009 @ 07:18 AM

  That was actually my first commit to my fork, viz,

  http://github.com/kleb/redcloth/...

  I've sent a pull request to jgarber.

• 

  Bil Kleb March 7th, 2009 @ 05:47 AM

  • Assigned user changed from “Jason Garber” to “Bil Kleb”
  • State changed from “new” to “resolved”

  http://github.com/jgarber/redclo...

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  emime March 9th, 2009 @ 07:13 AM

  I see from the code that "the starred way" was left. Is this compatible with secnumdepth counter? Otherwise please remove the stars.

  Cheers Emi

• 

  Bil Kleb March 9th, 2009 @ 07:59 AM

  In which code to you see the starred form?

  http://github.com/jgarber/redclo...

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  emime March 9th, 2009 @ 08:10 AM

  I followed the link before...this latest one shows me the correct code.

  Thanks Emi